Market snapshot, not real-time
S&P 500 (SPY) $748.62 +0.88% Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) $708.90 +1.85% Dow (DIA) $522.55 +0.89% Russell 2000 (IWM) $295.82 +1.20% 10-Year Treasury (IEF) $93.32 −0.23% Crude Oil (USO) $128.37 +2.28% Gold (GLD) $373.85 +1.70% US Dollar Index (UUP) $28.45 +0.23% Volatility (VXX) $21.29 −3.77% Semiconductors (SMH) $583.24 +4.37% Silver (SLV) $53.36 +4.67% Emerging Markets (EEM) $65.45 +2.97% Bitcoin (BTC) $66,470.13 +1.90% Ethereum (ETH) $1,922.88 +1.00% S&P 500 (SPY) $748.62 +0.88% Nasdaq-100 (QQQ) $708.90 +1.85% Dow (DIA) $522.55 +0.89% Russell 2000 (IWM) $295.82 +1.20% 10-Year Treasury (IEF) $93.32 −0.23% Crude Oil (USO) $128.37 +2.28% Gold (GLD) $373.85 +1.70% US Dollar Index (UUP) $28.45 +0.23% Volatility (VXX) $21.29 −3.77% Semiconductors (SMH) $583.24 +4.37% Silver (SLV) $53.36 +4.67% Emerging Markets (EEM) $65.45 +2.97% Bitcoin (BTC) $66,470.13 +1.90% Ethereum (ETH) $1,922.88 +1.00%

Position · Emerging Growth

The Cheesecake Factory (CAKE)

2.65% of book · Avg. cost $45.40 · Return +123.39%

Compare vs. competitors: The Cheesecake Factory vs. Darden Restaurants →

Read the full Q1 2026 earnings report →

Subscribe to CAKE updates (RSS) →

Download full 3-statement model (.xlsx) →

Thesis StatementA steady, dividend-paying, multi-concept restaurant operator — the most deliberately boring, diversifying position in a book otherwise concentrated in AI infrastructure.

CAKE The Cheesecake Factory
AEA Institutional Tear Sheet
2.65% of book · Avg. cost $45.40 · Return +123.39%

Core Thesis

The Cheesecake Factory owns multi-brand casual-dining concepts — its namesake restaurants, North Italia, and Flower Child — plus a bakery products division, giving it more than one growth vector rather than depending on a single aging concept.

Financial Metrics

  • Market Cap$3.93B
  • P/E (TTM)23.35
  • EPS (TTM)$3.41
  • Div. Yield1.51%
  • Price$79.18

Bear Case

A pullback in consumer discretionary spending hits casual dining broadly, labor and food-cost inflation pressures margins, and after this run the stock — near its 52-week high — has less cushion to absorb a same-store-sales miss.

Investment Thesis

The Thesis
The Cheesecake Factory owns multi-brand casual-dining concepts — its namesake restaurants, North Italia, and Flower Child — plus a bakery products division, giving it more than one growth vector rather than depending on a single aging concept.
The Catalyst
Continued unit growth and same-store-sales performance across the newer North Italia and Flower Child concepts, which are the parts of the business still expanding fastest; the position is already up nearly 70% on cost, sitting right near its 52-week high.
The Risk
A pullback in consumer discretionary spending would hit casual dining broadly, and after this run the stock — near its 52-week high — has less cushion to absorb a same-store-sales miss from labor and food-cost inflation.
The Connection
This is my one restaurant/consumer holding — a real, deliberate diversifier away from the tech and AI-infrastructure cluster that dominates the rest of the book.

Pre-Mortem Thesis Invalidation Parameters

Codified in advance, before any of these have happened, so a future decision to hold or exit isn't rationalized in the moment. If a condition below is met, the thesis as written is invalidated and the position gets re-underwritten from scratch — not automatically sold, but automatically questioned.

Metric / EventAutomatic Review Trigger
Same-Store SalesTurns negative for 2 consecutive quarters.
Restaurant-Level Operating MarginCompresses below 15% for 2 consecutive quarters on labor and food-cost inflation.

Primary Channel Check

I've eaten at all three brands, and the newer concepts are the tell

I've had meals at the flagship Cheesecake Factory and at both of the newer concepts, North Italia and Flower Child, and the difference in energy between them is the real story here, not just the menu. North Italia and Flower Child consistently have a wait to get a table even outside peak hours — the kind of organic demand that's hard to manufacture and easy to notice in person. That matches exactly what the bull case depends on: the newer, smaller-footprint concepts carrying unit growth while the mature namesake brand grows slowly.

This is one visit's worth of observation at each brand, not a same-store-sales dataset, and restaurant demand can vary a lot by location and day. But a consistent wait at the two brands the thesis is actually betting on is a real, first-hand signal, not just something in the 10-K.

Market cap$3.93B
P/E ratio (TTM)23.35
EPS (TTM)$3.41
Dividend yield1.51%
Shares outstandingN/A — not provided
SectorRetail-Eating Places
EBITDAEarnings Before Interest, Taxes, Depreciation, and Amortization — a measure of operating profitability before financing and accounting decisions. EV/EBITDA compares a company's full value (including debt) to this figure, often used to compare companies with different capital structures.EV/EBITDA 19.75x
PEG ratioPrice/Earnings-to-Growth: the P/E ratio divided by expected earnings growth. Below 1.0 is often read as cheap relative to growth; above suggests the market is pricing in a lot of future growth already. Different providers use different growth-rate assumptions, so figures vary by source.1.42
Capex~$210M (FY26 guidance); −$146.20M (TTM)

Market cap, P/E, EPS, and dividend yield via Blossom. Shares outstanding not available from a source I trust for this entry — left blank rather than estimated. EBITDA, PEG ratio, and capex sourced from public filings and financial-data aggregators (GuruFocus, StockAnalysis, company earnings releases). PEG ratio is sourced primarily from GuruFocus where available; different providers calculate PEG using different growth-rate assumptions, so figures from other sources for the same stock can vary by several multiples — a known limitation of PEG as a metric, not unique to any name here.

Valuation Logic

23.35x trailing earnings is a conventional, unexciting multiple for a mature consumer business — appropriately valued for what it is, without embedding any speculative growth assumption.

DCF Sensitivity Tool

A simplified single-stage model for exploring how WACC and terminal growth assumptions move an implied share price — not AEA's own valuation of this stock. Adjust the base cash-flow figure to run your own numbers.

Implied Share Price
Formula: Base FCF/Share × (1 + terminal growth) ÷ (WACC − terminal growth). A real DCF would forecast several years of cash flow explicitly rather than capitalize a single base year in perpetuity — this tool is a simplified illustration of how sensitive that kind of valuation is to two assumptions, not a price target.
$43.07 (52-wk low)$79.18$80.93 (52-wk high)

About the business

The Cheesecake Factory owns and operates casual-dining brands including its namesake Cheesecake Factory restaurants, North Italia, and Flower Child (through its Fox Restaurant Concepts subsidiary), along with a bakery products division that sells desserts to other retailers and foodservice customers.

Why I own it

This is my one restaurant/consumer holding — a real diversifier away from the tech and AI-infrastructure cluster that dominates the rest of the book. The multi-brand strategy (Cheesecake Factory, North Italia, Flower Child) gives it more than one growth vector rather than depending entirely on a single aging concept, and the position is up nearly 70% on cost, sitting right near its 52-week high.

Risk/Reward Profile

Bull CaseBear Case
North Italia and Flower Child keep expanding unit count faster than the mature Cheesecake Factory brand, same-store sales stay resilient even if consumer spending softens, and the bakery division continues to add a steady, less-cyclical revenue stream.A pullback in consumer discretionary spending hits casual dining broadly, labor and food-cost inflation pressures margins, and after this run the stock — near its 52-week high — has less cushion to absorb a same-store-sales miss.

Base case: The core Cheesecake Factory brand grows slowly while the newer concepts do the heavy lifting on unit growth, margins hold up around current levels, and the stock tracks that blended growth rate.

Download this position's data

Fundamentals, scenario matrix, and risk/reward table — exported exactly as published on this page, no reformatting.

Macro Stress-Test: How CAKE Fits In

The book-level stress test runs four scenarios against the whole portfolio. Here is exactly where CAKE sits in each one — named directly, or not addressed at all. Nothing below is invented for this page; it’s the same book-level analysis, filtered to this position.

Current positioning, no shock assumed

CAKE is 2.16% of the book, in the Consumer sector. See the full base-case positioning on Holdings.

Where this position sits in the book’s least-defended scenario

Not individually named in the book-level inflation analysis. CAKE contributes to the book’s overall growth-multiple exposure only through its Consumer sector weight — see the full scenario on Holdings for what is and isn’t defended.

Not individually assessed

Where this position sits in the book’s best-defended scenario

CAKE is a liquid, publicly traded security like every other position in the book — no private equity, no illiquid credit, no lockups. A genuinely broad market drawdown would still hurt (the book’s beta is 1.79), but this position doesn’t face the structural exit friction an illiquid holding would.

Liquid, publicly traded

Where this position sits in the book’s largest concentrated risk

Not part of the semiconductor sleeve this scenario is built around. CAKE sits in Consumer, so a Taiwan-centered supply disruption would hit this position only indirectly, if at all, through broader market effects.

Outside the named semiconductor exposure