Competitive Comparison
SpaceX vs. Rocket Lab
Two space-launch holdings in the same speculative sleeve — the dominant, diversified operator against the smaller small-satellite specialist scaling toward larger payloads.
| Metric | SpaceX (SPCX) | Rocket Lab (RKLB) |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio (TTM) | −49.37 | n/a (EV/EBITDA −191.50x) |
| Capex | ~$10.1B combined (Q1 FY26, all segments) | $27.07M (Q1 FY26) |
| PEG ratio | N/A (not yet consistently profitable across segments) | N/A (unprofitable) |
Why I hold both, at very different sizes
SpaceX is the dominant, diversified operator — reusable rockets, Starlink, and now xAI folded in — while Rocket Lab is the smaller, more focused small-satellite launch specialist working toward larger payloads with Neutron. I hold both because they represent different points on the same space-and-satellite-infrastructure theme, sized very differently given how much earlier-stage and less-established Rocket Lab's Neutron program is relative to SpaceX's already-proven Falcon/Starlink business. Neither is a scale comparison in SpaceX's favor by coincidence — it genuinely is the larger, more de-risked business — but Rocket Lab's smaller size is also why a real commercial Neutron launch would move its stock disproportionately more.