Independent student research — not an investment firm or financial advice
Competitive Comparison
Tempus AI vs. Veeva Systems
Two different applications of software to healthcare and life sciences — the speculative AI-diagnostics bet I hold against the established, profitable clinical-software platform I don't.
Metric
Tempus AI (TEM)
Veeva Systems (VEEV)
PEG ratio
Not disclosed in public data as of this writing
1.32
EV/EBITDA
n/m (TTM net loss $293M)
22.29x
Market cap
$9B
$31.59B
Market cap, P/E, PEG, EV/EBITDA, and capex sourced via public filings and financial-data aggregators (GuruFocus, StockAnalysis, company earnings releases), as of August 2026. PEG ratio sourced primarily from GuruFocus where available; different providers use different growth-rate assumptions, so figures elsewhere for the same stock can vary by several multiples. Gold-highlighted column(s) indicate the name(s) actually held in this book.
Why Tempus, sized small, not Veeva
Veeva is an established, profitable software platform serving life-sciences and pharma companies with clinical and regulatory workflow tools — a mature, checkable business with a reasonable 1.32 PEG. Tempus is a genuinely different, earlier-stage bet: applying generative AI directly to clinical, molecular, and imaging data to inform treatment decisions, still working toward the roughly $65 million in adjusted EBITDA guided for full-year 2026. I hold Tempus specifically because it's a distinct application-layer AI bet in healthcare, different from the infrastructure and chip names dominating the rest of the book, sized small in the speculative sleeve to reflect that it's still proving the model rather than scaling a proven one, the way Veeva already has.