Competitive Comparison
Taiwan Semiconductor vs. Intel Foundry
The dominant contract-chipmaking leader I watch but don't own, against the manufacturing turnaround bet I do — two very different stages of the same foundry business.
| Metric | Taiwan Semiconductor (TSM) | Intel (INTC) |
|---|---|---|
| P/E ratio (TTM) | 27.32 (forward 19.04) | n/m trailing (Q2 2026 turned a real profit; forward 76.86) |
| EV/EBITDA | 18.52x | 23.73–43.03x (wide swing, mid-turnaround) |
| Capex (TTM) | $40.41B | −$13.10B |
EV/EBITDA, compared
Why Intel, not TSMC — a deliberate turnaround bet
Taiwan Semiconductor is the dominant leading-edge foundry the entire industry depends on, with a reasonable trailing P/E of 27.32 and consistent profitability — genuinely the safer, more proven way to own the foundry business. I hold Intel instead because it's a specific, higher-risk turnaround bet: whether Intel Foundry can land real external customers and catch up on process-node execution, not a bet that Intel is currently the better business. Intel's Q2 2026 report was the first real proof point — revenue up 25% year-over-year, its fastest growth in over fifteen years, and EPS that doubled estimates — but one strong quarter doesn't resolve the multi-year foundry-execution question, and Intel's own valuation multiples are still swinging wildly quarter to quarter as the market tries to price the turnaround. I'm sized small in Intel on purpose because the thesis is still being proven in real time, while TSMC remains the lower-risk, already-priced-in way to own the same foundry theme.