Independent student research — not an investment firm or financial advice
Competitive Comparison
Coinbase vs. Robinhood
Two watchlist names monetizing retail trading activity from different angles — the crypto-native exchange against the multi-asset brokerage expanding into crypto.
Metric
Coinbase Global (COIN)
Robinhood Markets (HOOD)
PEG ratio
−1.10 (negative growth-rate assumption)
Not consistently disclosed across providers
P/E ratio (TTM)
53.02
38.13–40.47 (varies)
EV/EBITDA
41.77x
35.76–45.07x (varies)
EV/EBITDA, compared
HOOD
~40.4x (midpoint)
COIN
41.77x
EV/EBITDA rather than PEG this update, since COIN's PEG has gone negative (a growth-rate-assumption artifact, not a claim the business shrank) and no longer plots meaningfully against HOOD's positive figure. Bold = held in this book.
Market cap, P/E, PEG, EV/EBITDA, and capex sourced via public filings and financial-data aggregators (GuruFocus, StockAnalysis, company earnings releases), as of August 2026. PEG ratio sourced primarily from GuruFocus where available; different providers use different growth-rate assumptions, so figures elsewhere for the same stock can vary by several multiples. Gold-highlighted column(s) indicate the name(s) actually held in this book.
Why neither is in the book
Both are real, profitable businesses now rather than the speculative crypto-adjacent stories they were a few years ago, and both carry rich multiples reflecting that re-rating — Robinhood's EV/EBITDA is in a similar range to Coinbase's. Coinbase is the more crypto-native business; Robinhood has diversified into a broader multi-asset brokerage with crypto as one revenue stream among several. Neither is a position mainly because crypto-adjacent trading-volume businesses are a genuinely different risk category than anything else in the book — direct exposure to trading volume and crypto-market sentiment, rather than a company-specific operating thesis I can underwrite the way I do the rest of the portfolio.