Publishing desk
Loading example…
For potential participants
What you would actually do here.
The point is not to arrive knowing everything. It is to show your assumptions, respond to feedback, and leave the work easier for another reader to audit.
Your name stays with your work.
Published contributions would carry a named byline. Editing sharpens the piece; it does not erase the author or turn every voice into mine.
Educational work, not client work.
Fellows would be student contributors—not employees, advisers, portfolio managers, or representatives soliciting money or trades.
A possible first assignment
- Define the question and the reader.
- Build the evidence file and disclose what is missing.
- Submit a draft for a real countercase review.
- Revise, source, and publish under your own name.
Current status
Interested later? Here is how to prepare now.
Applications are not open yet, and I am not collecting names through a pretend waitlist. A strong future participant will be able to bring one question they genuinely care about, one sample of how they think, and a willingness to let another student challenge the work before it is published.
The program should be valuable because the work is real—not because the title sounds impressive.
Read the full Fellows standard